Chasidut · Izhbitz
Mei HaShiloach, Volume I, Genesis, Vayechi/מי השלוח· חלק א· ספר בראשית· ויחי
אוַיְחִי יַעֲקֹב. אִיתָא בְּמַסֶּכֶת אָבוֹת [פ"ג, מי"ז] אִם אֵין בִּינָה אֵין דַּעַת. בִּינָה הַיְינוּ הַכְּלָלִים שֶׁל ד"ת, הַיְינוּ טַעֲמֵי הַדְּבָרִים כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּמְצָא כַּמָּה פְּעָמִים זֶה הַכְּלָל וְע"י הַכְּלָל יִוָּדַע לָאָדָם כַּמָּה פְּרָטִים, וְדַעַת הַיְינוּ הַפְּרָטִים. וְזֶה פֵּי' אִם אֵין בִּינָה אֵין דַּעַת הַיְינוּ אִם אֵין הָאָדָם יוֹדֵעַ הַכְּלָל שֶׁהוּא טַעַם הַדָּבָר אֵינוֹ יָכוֹל לָדַעַת הַפְּרָט, כִּי מִפְּרָט אֶחָד לֹא יִוָּדַע פְּרָט הַשֵּׁנִי. וְכֵן לְהֵפֶךְ, אִם אֵין דַּעַת אֵין בִּינָה הַיְינוּ אִם תִּמְצָא לֵאמֹר אֵדַע הַכְּלָל וְלֹא אֶצְטָרֵךְ לִלְמוֹד הַפְּרָט, ע"ז אָמְרוּ אִם אֵין דַּעַת הַיְינוּ שֶׁלֹּא יִהְיוּ מְסוּדָּרִים אֶצְלְךָ הַפְּרָטִים, לֹא תֵּדַע שׁוֹרֶשׁ הַכְּלָל לַאֲמִיתּוֹ אֵיךְ יוּכַל לְהִסְתַּעֵף. וְזֶהוּ "וַיְחִי" הַיְינוּ שׁוֹרֶשׁ הַחַיִּים וְהוּא הַכְּלָל שֶׁל כָּל דָּבָר, וְיַעֲקֹב הַיְינוּ דַּעַת הוּא הַפְּרָט, כִּי יַעֲקֹב מְכוּנֶּה נֶגֶד זְעֵיר אַנְפִּין הַיְינוּ שֶׁהַש"י מַשְׁגִּיחַ עַל כָּל פְּרָט עַל כָּל דְּבָרִים הַנִּצְרָכִים לוֹ, אֲפִילּוּ קָטָן שֶׁבַּקְּטַנִּים.
1“And Yaakov lived ….” (Bereshit, 47:28)It is written in the tractate Avot (Ch. 3, Mishna 17), “if there is no understanding [Binah], then there is no knowledge [Da’at].” “Understanding” means the principles of words of Torah, meaning the reasons for things, as in the phrase often found, “this is the principle,” and by means of this principle man may know several details. “Knowledge”42, which is more than knowledge; rather a kind of consciousness that enables the intellect to synthesize conflicting information. is the details. This is the meaning of “if there is no understanding then there is no knowledge,” for if a man does not know the general principle that is the reason for the matter, then he cannot understand the detail, for from one detail is known the next detail. The converse is also true, for if there is no knowledge then there is no understanding. For if one can say that he knows a principle, but does not need to know its resulting details, on this it says, “if there is no knowledge.” Meaning, if the details are not organized for you, then you will not be able to truly know the root of the principle, so how will you be able to branch out from there? This is the meaning of “and he lived,” meaning the root of life, which is the principle of everything; and “Yaakov” means knowledge [Da’at] which is the detail, for Yaakov represents Zeir Anpin.43 represents the “miniature presence,” and is one of the Divine personae in the kabbalah. In other words, (Yaakov is) how God watches, or rather, is intimately involved, in every detail necessary for every matter, even the smallest of the small.
בשִׂכֵּל אֶת יָדָיו. לֶהֱיוֹת כִּי יִצְחָק אָבִינוּ הָיָה מַדְרֵגָתוֹ מִדּוֹת הַגְּבוּרָה, וְלָכֵן רָצָה לְבָרֵךְ אֶת עֵשָׂו, כִּי מִדַּת הַגְּבוּרָה מוֹרָה עַל דִּבְרֵי תּוֹרָה (מגילה ל"א:) כָּךְ שָׁמַע מֹשֶׁה מִפִּי הַגְּבוּרָה וְלָכֵן אָמַר יִקּוֹב הַדִּין אֶת הָהָר, וּלְכָךְ לֹא הָיָה בְּכֹחוֹ לַעֲשׂוֹת נֶגֶד הַמִּשְׁפָּט וְרָצָה לְבָרֵךְ אֶת עֵשָׂו בְּיַעַן כִּי הָיָה בְּכוֹר. אַךְ כִּי הַשֵּׁם יִתְבָּרַךְ סוֹמֵךְ יָדַיִם טְהוֹרוֹת כִּי הַיָּדַיִם הֵם עַנְפֵי הַלֵּב, וְלִבּוֹ הָיָה טָהוֹר וּמְזֻכָּךְ וְסִיבֵּב הַדָּבָר שֶׁיְּבָרֵךְ אֶת יַעֲקֹב בְּלֹא דַּעְתּוֹ, וְעַל זֶה נֶאֱמַר (תהלים ט"ז,ה') "אַתָּה תּוֹמִיךְ גּוֹרָלִי", אֲבָל יַעֲקֹב אָבִינוּ הָיָה מִסְתַּכֵּל תָּמִיד אֶל הַבִּינָה וְלִרְצוֹן הַשֵּׁם יִתְבָּרַךְ, וְלָכֵן נֶאֱמַר "יָדַעְתִּי בְנִי יָדַעְתִּי" "שִׂכֵּל אֶת יָדָיו", "וַיָּשֶׂם אֶת אֶפְרַיִם לִפְנֵי מְנַשֶּׁה".
2“… guiding his hands intentionally [Yaakov moving his right hand over his left to place it on Efriam for the blessing] ….” (Bereshit, 48:14)Since the attribute of Yitzchak Avinu was that of Gevurah (strength), he wanted to bless Eisav, because the attribute of Gevurah teaches of the Torah, as it is written (Megillah 31b), “[at Sinai] Moshe heard from the mouth of Gevurah.” Therefore it says, “let the judgment [Din, Gevurah] cut through the mountain [meaning to follow the judgment under all circumstances].” This is why it was not in Yitzchak’s power to go against the judgment, and he wanted to give the blessing to Eisav since he was the elder son. Yet since God supports the pure of hand, for the hands are branches of the heart, and his heart was pure and refined, then the result was that Yaakov would bless without (or independent of) his own knowledge. Therefore it is written (Tehilim, 16:5), “You support my fate,” yet Yaakov Avinu always looked towards the understanding and God’s will. Therefore he said, “I knew, my son, I knew,” “guiding his hands intentionally,” placing Efriam before Menashe.
גוַיֹּאמַר הָאֱלֹקִים אֲשֶׁר הִתְהַלְּכוּ אֲבוֹתַי לְפָנָיו הָאֱלֹקִים הָרוֹעֶה אוֹתִי מֵעוֹדִי. הַיְינוּ שֶׁיַּעֲקֹב אָבִינוּ הָיָה מַקְטִין עַצְמוֹ נֶגֶד אֲבוֹתָיו אַבְרָהָם וְיִצְחָק, וְאָמַר כִּי לָהֶם הָיָה חָכְמָה וּבִינָה גְּדוֹלָה מְאֹד עַד כִּי הִרְחִיבוּ אֶת רְצוֹן הַש"י מֵעַצְמָם, וְאַף אִם פָּתַח לָהֶם הַש"י פֶּתַח קָטָן, הָיוּ מַרְחִיבִים וּמִתְפַּשְּׁטִים אוֹתוֹ בְּחָכְמָתָם כְּדֵי לַעֲשׂוֹת רְצוֹן בּוֹרְאָם, וְהֵבִינוּ אַף בְּדָבָר שֶׁלֹּא הֵאִיר לָהֶם הַש"י מְפֹרָשׁ, וְזֶה פֵּירוּשׁ "אֲשֶׁר הִתְהַלְּכוּ" הַיְינוּ שֶׁהָיוּ הוֹלְכִים בְּכֹחָם. אֲבָל אֲנִי, "הָאֱלֹקִים הָרוֹעֶה אוֹתִי מֵעוֹדִי עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה", הַיְינוּ בְּכָל פְּרָט מַעֲשֶׂה שֶׁאֲנִי עוֹשֶׂה, אֲנִי צָרִיךְ שֶׁהַש"י יָאִיר עֵינַי אֵיךְ הוּא רְצוֹנוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, וְאַף בְּזֶה הַמַּעֲשֶׂה שֶׁרָאִיתִי אֵיךְ הוּא רְצוֹנוֹ, אִם רְצוֹנוֹ לְשַׁנּוֹתָהּ, מִכָּל מָקוֹם צָרִיךְ אֲנִי לִרְאוֹת גַּם בַּפַּעַם הַשֵּׁנִית אֵיךְ הוּא רְצוֹנוֹ יִתְבָּרַךְ, וּבֶאֱמֶת בְּזֶה הָעִנְיָן הָיָה יַעֲקֹב הַגָּדוֹל שֶׁבָּאָבוֹת כִּי זֹאת הִיא מַדְרֵגָה גְּדוֹלָה שֶׁהַש"י מַנְהִיג אֶת הָאָדָם תָּמִיד, וְזֹאת הָיְתָה תְּפִלַּת דָּוִד הַמֶּלֶךְ עָלָיו הַשָּׁלוֹם (תהלים כ"ג,א') "ה' רוֹעִי לֹא אֶחְסָר", הַיְינוּ שֶׁלֹּא אַחְסִיר הַשְׁגָּחַת הַש"י עָלַי וְרַק שֶׁיִּהְיֶה רוֹעֶה אוֹתִי תָּמִיד וְגַם אֲנִי אַכִּיר תָּמִיד שֶׁהַש"י הוּא רוֹעִי, כִּי הַשֵּׁם יִתְבָּרַךְ בְּטוּבוֹ מַנְהִיג כָּל דָּבָר, אַךְ שֶׁהָאָדָם מַחְזִיר פָּנָיו וְאֵינוֹ רוֹצֶה לְצַפּוֹת וּלְהִתְפַּלֵּל, וּבְעֵת שֶׁהָאָדָם יִתְפַּלֵּל תְּפִלָּה שְׁלֵימָה אָז תֵּיכֶף יֵעָנֶה, וְיִרְאֶה כִּי הַש"י הוּא הָרוֹעֶה וְזֶה פֵּירוּשׁ "לֹא אֶחְסָר" הַיְינוּ שֶׁלֹּא אַחְזִיר פָּנַי מִמֶּנּוּ.
3“… God before whom my fathers walked … who guided me all my life ….” (Bereshit, 48:15)Yaakov Avinu made himself small before his fathers, Avraham and Yitzchak. He said that their wisdom and understanding was so great that they could by themselves cause an expansion of God’s will. Even if God created a small opening for them, in their wisdom they would expand and extend it in order to do the will of their Creator, and would understand even what God had not explicitly illuminated to them. This is the meaning of “before whom my fathers walked,” meaning that they went by means of their own power. But as for me, “E-lohim who guided me all my life until this day,” meaning that for every action I do, no matter how small, I need God to illuminate His will into me. I even need it with this action (blessing Menashe and Efriam), where I saw how it is His will to change it (to bless the younger before the older), nevertheless I need to see even the second time how it is His blessed will. Truly in this matter Yaakov was the greatest of the Patriarchs, for to have God constantly lead one’s actions is a great level. This was the prayer of King David (Tehilim, 23:1), “God is my shepherd, I will lack nothing,” meaning that for me the Providence of God will not be lacking, He will always guide me, and I will be ever aware that God is guiding me. In His goodness He conducts everything, it is only man who turns his face away, not wanting to behold and pray. Yet at a time when a man prays a complete prayer he is answered immediately, and he will see that God is the Shepherd. This is the meaning of “I shall not lack,” meaning that he will not turn his face from Him.
דוַיִּקְרָא יַעֲקֹב אֶל בָּנָיו. בַּמִּדְרָשׁ (תנחומא ויחי ח') "אֶקְרָא לֵאלֹקִים עֶלְיוֹן לָאֵל גּוֹמֵר עָלָי". הָעִנְיָן בָּזֶה כִּי כַּאֲשֶׁר רָצָה יַעֲקֹב אָבִינוּ לְבָרֵךְ אֶת בָּנָיו, הָיָה מְסֻפָּק אִם צָרִיךְ לְבָרֵךְ אוֹתָם מֵחֲמַת שֶׁצִּעֲרוּהוּ בִּמְכִירַת יוֹסֵף וְכָל תַּלְמִיד חָכָם שֶׁאֵינוֹ נוֹקֵם וְנוֹטֵר וכו' (יומא כ"ב:) לָכֵן נֶאֱמַר "וַיִּקְרָא" לְשׁוֹן צְעָקָה וְקִוּוּי בַּלֵּב שֶׁהָיָה תּוֹלֶה עֵינָיו וְלִבּוֹ לַמָּרוֹם וְאֵת אֲשֶׁר יָשִׂים ה' בְּפִיו אוֹתוֹ יֹאמַר, וְזֶה כַּוָּונַת הַמִּדְרָשׁ שֶׁהִזְכִּיר זֶה הַפָּסוּק שֶׁבִּקֵּשׁ מֵה' שֶׁיִּגְמוֹר בַּעֲדוֹ. וְלֹא נֶאֱמַר תְּחִילָּה לְשׁוֹן בְּרָכָה כִּי עוֹד לֹא הָיָה מְבוֹרָר אֶצְלוֹ מַה יֹּאמַר לָהֶם, אֲבָל מֹשֶׁה רַבֵּינוּ עָלָיו הַשָּׁלוֹם הִתְחִיל תֵּיכֶף "וְזֹאת הַבְּרָכָה" כִּי מִילַּת "וְזֹאת" מוֹרָה עַל זֶה שֶׁהָיוּ כָּל הַדְּבָרִים מְבוֹרָרִים אֶצְלוֹ מִיָּד כְּשֶׁהִתְחִיל לְדַבֵּר, וּבְיַעֲקֹב לֹא נֶאֱמַר "וְזֹאת" רַק אַחַר כָּל הַבְּרָכוֹת שֶׁרַק אָז אַחַר כָּל הַדְּבָרִים הָיוּ אֶצְלוֹ מְבוֹרָרִים שֶׁכָּל בִּרְכוֹתָיו הֵמָּה מֵהַש"י וְלֹא מִקּוֹדֶם. וְהִנֵּה תְּחִילָּה נָתַן ה' דְּבָרִים שֶׁל קִנְטוּר בְּפִיו לְקַנְטֵר הַשְּׁלֹשָׁה שְׁבָטִים הָרִאשׁוֹנִים, כִּי תַּלְמִיד חָכָם צָרִיךְ לִנְקוֹם וְלִנְטוֹר וּכְשֶׁהִגִּיעַ לְשֵׁבֶט יְהוּדָא אָז הֶרְאָהוּ ה' מִן הַשָּׁמַיִם לְהַעֲבִיר עַל מִדּוֹתָיו, כִּי בְּאוֹתִיּוֹת יְהוּדָא נִמְצָא שֵׁם הוי״ה יִתְבָּרַךְ, וְהַד' שֶׁבִּשְׁמוֹ מְרַמֵּז עַל פָּסוּק (ישעיה ס"ו,ב') "וְאֶל זֶה אַבִּיט אֶל עָנִי וּנְכֵה רוּחַ וְחָרֵד עַל דְּבָרִי". הַיְינוּ שֶׁמֵּבִין כִּי אֵין לוֹ מִצַּד עַצְמוֹ כְּלוּם כִּדְאִיתָא בַּגְּמָ' (זוהר בראשית רמ"ד:) ד' לָקֵיט, עַל כֵּן לֹא הָיָה בָּזֶה מָקוֹם לָחוּל שׁוּם כַּעַס וָרוֹגֶז כְּלָל, וְכַאֲשֶׁר נִפְתַּח בִּיהוּדָא מִדּוֹת הָרַחֲמִים נִתְגַּבֵּר גַּם עַל שְׁאָר הַשְּׁבָטִים וְנִכְלְלוּ כֻּלָּן בַּבְּרָכָה.
4“And Yaakov called to his sons ….” (Bereshit, 49:1)It is written on this in the Midrash (Tanchuma, Vayechi, 8), “I shall call to the supernal E-lohim, to God who does all for me” (Tehilim, 57:3). Now that Yaakov Avinu wanted to bless his sons, he was unsure as to whether he needed to bless them after the anguish they caused him with the sale of Yosef, and, “any talmid chocham [Torah scholar] who is not vengeful and grudge-bearing like a serpent is not a talmid chocham” (Yoma, 22b). Therefore it says, “and he called,” which is an expression of crying out and longing of the heart, for he gave over his eyes and heart to the heights (to God) and let himself say whatever God put in his mouth. This is why the Midrash mentions this verse, as he asked God to complete the action for him. The word “blessing” is not used first (it does not say “he called his sons to bless them”) as it was still not yet clear to him what he was going to say. However, with Moshe Rabeynu, he began immediately by saying “this is the blessing,” since it was immediately clear to him what he was going to say when he began to speak.With Yaakov, it only says “he blessed them” after he finished speaking (in verse 28), for only after he finished speaking, and not before, was it clear to him that all his blessings were from God. At first, God placed words of rebuke in his mouth, to chide the first three tribes, for “a talmid chocham must be vengeful and grudge-bearing.” Then when he arrived at the tribe of Yehuda, God showed him from Heaven that he needed to be forgiving, for in the letters of “Yehuda” are the four letters of God’s blessed name, YHVH. These four letters in his name hint at the verse (Yesahya, 66:2), “I will look to this one, to the poor and contrite of spirit, and he will tremble at my word.” This means that there was nothing from Yehuda’s own initiative (he was an instrument of God), as it says (Zohar, Bereshit, 244b), “the dalet gathers up.” (Meaning that the dalet in Yehuda’s name [signifying Malchut, reception] would gather up whatever God’s name would give him.) Therefore there was no room to bear any anger against him, so when Yaakov began to bless Yehuda with the attribute of compassion, this attribute took over with the rest of the tribes and they were all included in his blessing.
הוּבְדַם עֲנָבִים סוּתֹה. סוּתֹה הַיְינוּ לְשׁוֹן הֲסָתָה כִּי הַהֲסָתָה שֶׁל שׁוֹרֶשׁ יְהוּדָא הִיא אַחֲרֵי הַחֵטְא וּמִכְשׁוֹל שֶׁאֵירַע לוֹ יִתְעוֹרֵר עוֹז בְּנַפְשׁוֹ, אֵין זֹאת רַק שֶׁהַש"י יִרְצֶה לְהוֹשִׁיעֵנִי בְּיֶתֶר שְׂאֵת, כִּי עֲנָבִים הַיְינוּ טָעוּת וְשִׁכְחָה, וּמֹשֶׁה רַבֵּינוּ אָמַר (דברים ל"ב,י"ד) "וְדַם עֵנָב תִּשְׁתֶּה חָמֶר", חָמֶר מוֹרֶה עַל "עַיִן לֹא רָאָתָה אֱלֹקִים זוּלָתְךָ" כִּי אֵין מַלְאֲכֵי הַשָּׁרֵת מַכִּירִין בִּלְשׁוֹן אֲרָמִי (שבת י"ב:). רַק מֹשֶׁה מִלְּגָאו וְיַעֲקֹב מִלְּבַר, כִּי אֵצֶל יַעֲקֹב נֶאֱמַר עֲנָבִים הַיְינוּ שְׁנֵי טָעוּתִים יְבָרֵר הַש"י עַל שֵׁבֶט יְהוּדָא הַיְינוּ יִצְרָא דַּעֲרָיוֹת וְיִצְרָא דַּעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה, וּבֵירֵר הַש"י שֶׁהוּא נָקִי בִּשְׁתֵּיהֶן, וּמֹשֶׁה מִלְּגָאו כִּי מֹשֶׁה רַבֵּינוּ עָלָיו הַשָּׁלוֹם רָאָה כִּי אֵין לִיהוּדָא שׁוּם טָעוּת בְּיִצְרָא דַּעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה כִּי בָּזֶה כְּבָר נִתְבָּרֵר שֶׁהוּא נָקִי מְאֹד, רַק יִצְרָא דַּעֲרָיוֹת צָרִיךְ עוֹד לְהִתְבָּרֵר, כִּדְאָמַר רַב (סנהדרין ס"ג:) "לֹא עָבְדוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶת הָעֵגֶל אֶלָּא לְהַתִּיר לָהֶם עֲרָיוֹת בְּפַרְהֶסְיָא" אֲבָל בְּיִצְרָא דַּעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה כְּבָר הֵם נְקִיִּים וְהָבֵן.
5“… and in the blood of grapes his garment.” (Bereshit, 49:11)The word used for garment, “sutah” (on which Rashi notes is the only such usage in all of Scripture) is an expression meaning incitement (“hasatah”). The incitement, or accusation against the root of the soul of Yehuda, which came about after the sin and failure that he had encountered, caused strength to wake in his heart, saying, “this is only because God desires to save me with greater strength.” For “grapes” means mistakes and forgetting. Moshe Rabeynu had said (Devarim, 32:14), “and of the blood of the grape you drank foaming wine,”44.” which teaches of “no eye has seen a god besides You …” (Yesahya, 64:4). The ministering angels do not understand Aramaic.45, 12b, and he would not have understood the word Moshe used, chamer. This was purely for humankind, and chama is “seeing” in Aramaic. Moshe represents the inner aspect, and Yaakov the outer aspects.46 of the Ari’zal. With Yaakov it says “grapes,” meaning that God will clarify the two mistakes of the tribe of Yehuda, which are the inclination to forbidden sexual relations and the inclination to idolatry. God will make it clear that they are clean in both aspects. Moshe Rabeynu, who represents the inner aspects, saw that there was no fault in Yehuda concerning the inclination to idolatry, yet the inclination to promiscuity still needed to be disencumbered, as Rav said (Sanhedrin, 63b), “Israel only worshipped the golden calf in order to permit promiscuity in public.” Yet they were already clean concerning idolatry.
ובִּנְיָמִין זְאֵב יִטְרָף. כִּי בִּנְיָמִין הוּא מְקַבֵּץ כָּל הַטּוֹבוֹת מִבֵּין הָאוּמּוֹת וּמַכְנִיסָם לְיִשְׂרָאֵל.
6“Binyamin is a wolf that tears, in the morning he will devour, at night he will divide his spoil.” (Bereshit, 49:27)Binyamin gathers all the good scattered among the nations and brings it into Israel.
זגָּד גְּדוּד יְגוּדֶנּוּ וְהוּא יָגֻד עָקֵב. דְּהִנֵּה בְּהַי"ב שִׁבְטֵי יָהּ נָתַן הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא אוֹר וְחַיִּים שֶׁאֵין אֶחָד דּוֹמֶה לַחֲבֵרוֹ, וּלְכָךְ נִקְרָאִים גְּבוּלֵי אֲלַכְסוֹן הַיְינוּ שֶׁאוֹרוֹ שֶׁל זֶה הוּא הֵיפֶךְ מִשֶּׁל זֶה, כִּי לָזֶה נִמְשָׁךְ כֹּחַ חִיּוּתוֹ מִמִּדַּת הָאַהֲבָה וְלָזֶה מִמִּדַּת הַיִּרְאָה וְכַדּוֹמֶה. וַעֲבוּר זֶה נִמְצָא כָּל הַפְּלוּגְתּוֹת בַּגְּמָרָא אַף כִּי הַכֹּל הוֹלֵךְ לְמָקוֹם אֶחָד כְּדֵי לְקַיֵּים רְצוֹן הַש"י, כְּמוֹ שֶׁמָּצָאנוּ בַּגְּמָרָא (פסחים נ"ג:) "בֵּין שֶׁאָמְרוּ לְהַדְלִיק וּבֵין שֶׁאָמְרוּ שֶׁלֹּא לְהַדְלִיק שְׁנֵיהֶם לְדָבָר אֶחָד נִתְכַּוְּונוּ", וְכֵן הוּא כָּל הַפְּלוּגְתּוֹת כִּי מְקוֹרָם מִמָּקוֹם אֶחָד וְלָכֵן נִקְרָאִים שְׁבָטִים מִלְּשׁוֹן עֲנָפִים שֶׁמִּתְפַּשְּׁטִים לְכָאן וּלְכָאן. וְהוּא שֶׁהִנִּיחַ הַש"י בְּשֵׁבֶט גָּד מִדַּת יִסּוּרִין כִּי זֶה הַשֵּׁבֶט אוֹמֵר כִּי בִּלְתִּי אֶפְשָׁר שֶׁיִּכָּנְסוּ דִּבְרֵי תּוֹרָה בְּלֵב הָאָדָם בְּלֹא יִסּוּרִין, וּבְדֶרֶךְ עוֹלָם מִי שֶׁהוּא בַּעַל יִסּוּרִין אֵין לוֹ כָּל כָּךְ שִׂמְחָה וְאֵינוֹ כָּל כָּךְ בְּצַוְותָּא עִם בְּנֵי אָדָם. וְלָכֵן נִתְבָּרְכוּ שֶׁיִּהְיֶה לָהֶם שִׂמְחָה וְצַוְותָּא, וּבֵרֵךְ אוֹתָם שֶׁיִּהְיֶה לָהֶם הִתְחַבְּרוּת וְיִהְיֶה בָּהֶם גְּדוּדִים גְּדוּדִים, וְלָכֵן לֹא נִמְצָא בְּשׁוּם שֵׁבֶט שֶׁיִּכְלוֹל כָּל הַמִּסְפָּרִים הַיְינוּ מֵאוֹת וַאֲלָפִים וַעֲשָׂרוֹת רַק בְּשֵׁבֶט גָּד מַה שֶּׁאֵינוֹ בִּשְׁאָר הַשְּׁבָטִים, "וְהוּא יָגֻד עָקֵב" הַיְינוּ בִּזְמַן שֶׁיִּצְטָרֵךְ לְקַבֵּץ אֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל אָז הוּא יֶאֱגוֹד וְיִקְשׁוֹר אֶת כָּל יִשְׂרָאֵל, וּמִמֶּנּוּ יָבֹא כָּל מִינֵי שִׂמְחָה לְיִשְׂרָאֵל, כִּי אֵלִיָּהוּ הוּא מִשֵּׁבֶט גָּד כַּנִּזְכָּר בַּמִּדְרָשׁ (בראשית רבה פרשה ע"א,י"ב).
7“Gad, a troop shall troop upon him, but he shall troop upon their heel.” (Bereshit, 49:19)The Holy One, blessed be He, gave the twelve tribes of Yah (God) light and life, and no one is like another. Therefore they are called “diagonal borders,” meaning that the light of this one is the opposite of this one, for this one draws its life force from the attribute of love, and this one from the attribute of fear, and the like. Concerning this we find that each side in every disagreement in the Gemara really goes to the same place in order to fulfill God’s will. We find an example of this in the Gemara (Pesachim, 53b), “whether they say to light [in one’s home on Yom Kippur] or whether they say not to light, they both intend the same thing.”47 So it is with all differing opinions, for their source is really one. Therefore the word for tribe, shevet, comes from the word for branch, for they are all branches coming out of the same place (consider twelve lines in different directions all coming out of a single point).We find that God singled out the tribe of Gad for suffering. The tribe of Gad said that without suffering and tribulation the Torah may not enter into the heart of man, and it is the way of the world that one who suffers obviously has little joy and does not enjoy so much company with his fellow man. Therefore Gad was blessed that they should have joy and company, blessing them to be connected and including many troops of friends. This is why the only tribe whose number includes both thousands, hundreds, and tens is Gad.48 1:25, where the number of the tribe of Gad is 4,650. “But he shall troop upon their heel,” meaning that at the time when it will be necessary to gather all of Israel together, then Gad will be the one to bind and connect them.49 All kinds of joy will come forth from him to Israel, for Eliyahu comes from the tribe of Gad (Bereshit Rabba, 71:12).50) in joy at the end (Ekev—“heel or end”) meaning with the coming of the Messiah.
חנַפְתָּלִי אַיָּלָה שְׁלוּחָה הַנֹּתֵן אִמְרֵי שָׁפֶר. הַיְינוּ כִּי נִמְצָא בּוֹ הַשָּׂגָה גְּדוֹלָה בְּכָל עִנְיְינֵי הָעוֹלָם הַזֶּה לִשְׁאוֹל תֵּיכֶף מִי בָּרָא אֵלֶּה, וְזֶה פֵּירוּשׁ "הַנֹּתֵן אִמְרֵי שָׁפֶר" הַיְינוּ שֶׁכֵּיוָן שֶׁהָיָה מַכִּיר אֶת הַש"י בְּכָל דָּבָר הָיָה נוֹתֵן הוֹדָאָה אֵלָיו, וְזֶה שֶׁתַּרְגּוּם אוּנְקְלוֹס יְהוֹן מוֹדִין וּמְבָרְכִין עֲלֵיהֶן.
8“Naftali is a hind let loose, he gives words of beauty.” (Bereshit, 49:21)Meaning that within Naftali is a great understanding to ask concerning all the matters of this world, “who created these?” This is the meaning of “he gives words of beauty,” that since he recognizes the presence of God in everything, he would give thanks for it. This is why Onkeles translates, “he gives thanks and blesses over them.”
טוַיֶּאֱסוֹף רַגְלָיו אֶל הַמִּטָּה. אִיתָא בַּגְּמָרָא (תענית ה':) "יַעֲקֹב אָבִינוּ לֹא מֵת", הָעִנְיָן בָּזֶה כִּי עִנְיַן מִיתָה הוּא הִשְׁתַּנּוּת הָאָדָם מֵעוֹלָם הַזֶּה לְעוֹלָם הַבָּא, וְיַעֲקֹב כָּל אוֹתָן שָׁנִים שֶׁהָיָה בְּמִצְרַיִם הִטְעִימוֹ הַש"י טִיפָּה חַיִּים מֵעֵין עוֹלָם הַבָּא, עַל כֵּן נֶאֱמַר עָלָיו לֹא מֵת כִּי לֹא נִשְׁתַּנָּה בְּמוֹתוֹ כְּלוּם, וְעַל זֶה מַסְמִיךְ תֵּיכֶף הַגְּמָרָא "כָּל הָאוֹמֵר רָחָב רָחָב מִיָּד נִקְרֵי" וּמַסִּיק שָׁם הַגְּמָרָא בְּיוֹדְעָהּ וּמַכִּירָהּ, וְלָזֶה הִיא סְמִיכוּת הַגְּמָרָא לְהַרְאוֹת כִּי כְּמוֹ שֶׁנִּמְצָא בְּעִנְיְינֵי הָעוֹלָם הַזֶּה חֶמְדָּה שֶׁנִּשְׁאָר קָבוּעַ בְּלֵב הָאָדָם, כֵּן הָיָה הַטִּיפָּה חַיִּים שֶׁנִּקְבַּע בְּלֵב יַעֲקֹב אָבִינוּ בְּעֵת אֲשֶׁר נָטַף בּוֹ הַש"י נִשְׁאַר בּוֹ קָבוּעַ גַּם אַחַר כָּךְ, עַל כֵּן לֹא יִתָּכֵן לְהֵאָמֵר בּוֹ לְשׁוֹן מִיתָה רַק כְּאָדָם שֶׁפּוֹשֵׁט מַלְבּוּשָׁיו וְלוֹבֵשׁ בְּגָדִים אֲחֵרִים, וְזֶה עִנְיַן הַפָּסוּק (ישעיה נ"ח,ח') "אָז יִבָּקַע כַּשַּׁחַר אוֹרֶךָ", יִבָּקַע הֵם אוֹתִיּוֹת יַעֲקֹב וְגַם אוֹתִיּוֹת קָבוּעַ, וְהָבֵן.
9“… he gathered up his feet into the bed ….” (Bereshit, 49:33)It is written in the Gemara (Ta’anit, 5b), “Yaakov Avinu did not die.” Death is man’s transformation from this world to the world to come. With Yaakov, all the while he was in Egypt, God let him taste a little of the life of the world to come, therefore it says that he did not die, for he did not experience any change with his death. On this, the Gemara follows immediately with, “all who so much as say the name, ‘Rachav, Rachav’ [the most beautiful prostitute of her time] will experience a seminal flow.” The Gemara concludes that “this was true for those who knew her and had seen her.” These two matters are juxtaposed in the Gemara in order to show that just as with the affairs of this world desire remains fixed in the heart of man, so too was the drop of life (from the world to come) fixed in the heart of Yaakov Avinu from the time God dripped it into him and forevermore. Therefore it is inconceivable that the expression death would have any relevance to Yaakov Avinu any more than one who removes his garments and dresses in other garments. This is the meaning of the verse (Yesahya, 58:8), “then your light shall break forth as the morning,” for “break forth” “is comprised of the same letters as Yaakov” and also “fixed.” Understand this.51, the Gate of Principles of the Kabbalah, Chapter Ten, which precedes the Eyts Haiim.
יוְאַתֶּם חֲשַׁבְתֶּם עָלַי רָעָה אֱלֹקִים חֲשָׁבָהּ לְטוֹבָה. בָּזֶה הָעִנְיָן הֶרְאָה הַש"י אֵיךְ הָיָה בְּאֶפְשָׁר לְהָבִיא הַשְּׁבָטִים בְּגָלוּת מִצְרַיִם וְעִיקָּר הָיָה הַפֵּירוּד שֶׁהִתְחִילוּ לְהִפָּרֵד, כִּי בְּעֵת שֶׁיִּשְׂרָאֵל בְּאַחְדוּת לֹא יוּכַל לִשְׁלוֹט עֲלֵיהֶם שׁוּם דָּבָר. וְהָעִנְיָן בָּזֶה הָיָה שֶׁפֵּירַשׁ יוֹסֵף מִן הַשְּׁבָטִים, כִּי בְּעוֹד שֶׁיַּעֲקֹב אָבִינוּ הָיָה קַיָּים לֹא הָיָה נִיכָּר מִמֶּנּוּ מִי הוּא הַגָּדוֹל שֶׁבַּשְּׁבָטִים כִּי לִפְעָמִים הָיָה מְקָרֵב אֶת זֶה יוֹתֵר וְלִפְעָמִים זֶה יוֹתֵר, אֵיזֶה שֶׁהָיָה יָשָׁר בְּעֵינָיו בְּאוֹתָהּ שָׁעָה, אַךְ קוֹדֶם לִפְטִירָתוֹ בְּשָׁעָה שֶׁבֵּרְכָם וְאָמַר לִיהוּדָא "יִשְׁתַּחֲווּ לְךָ בְּנֵי אָבִיךָ" אָז הִכִּירוּ כֻּלָּם כִּי יְהוּדָא גָּבַר בְּאֶחָיו, וּלְכָךְ לֹא הָיָה יוֹסֵף יוֹדֵעַ אֵיךְ לְהִתְנַהֵג, בְּאִם לְהוֹשִׁיב אֶת יְהוּדָא בָּרֹאשׁ הֲלֹא הוּא מֶלֶךְ וְאָסוּר לְזַלְזֵל בַּמֶּלֶךְ, וּבְאִם שֶׁיֵּשֵׁב הוּא בְּעַצְמוֹ בָּרֹאשׁ הֲלֹא יוֹדֵעַ בְּעַצְמוֹ כִּי יְהוּדָא הוּא הָרֹאשׁ עַל כֵּן יָשַׁב בִּפְנֵי עַצְמוֹ וְלֹא עִם הַשְּׁבָטִים, וְהַשְּׁבָטִים דָּנוּ אוֹתוֹ שֶׁעָשָׂה זֹאת מֵחֲמַת שִׂנְאָה וּלְכָךְ נֶעֶנְשׁוּ לִהְיוֹת בְּגָלוּת כִּי הָיָה לָהֶם לְדוּנוֹ לְכַף זְכוּת, וְגַם לְיוֹסֵף נֶחְשַׁב לְחֵטְא עַל אֲשֶׁר הִנִּיחַ לָהֶם מָקוֹם לִטְעוֹת בּוֹ, כִּי בֶּאֱמֶת הָיָה לוֹ לְהִתְנַהֵג שֶׁהוּא יֵשֵׁב בָּרֹאשׁ מֵאַחַר שֶׁלְּעֵת עַתָּה הוּא מֶלֶךְ, אַךְ בְּלִבּוֹ הָיָה צָרִיךְ לֵידַע כִּי יְהוּדָא גָּדוֹל מִמֶּנּוּ. וּבֶאֱמֶת מֵאַחַר שֶׁהַשְּׁבָטִים טָעוּ בּוֹ הָיָה נִמְצָא בַּדָּבָר שֵׁמֶץ מֶנְהוּ לְעֵינֵי אָדָם, וְעַל זֶה צָרִיךְ הָאָדָם לְהִתְפַּלֵּל תָּמִיד לִפְנֵי הַש"י שֶׁלֹּא יָבוֹא בְּדַעְתּוֹ לָדוּן אֶת חֲבֵרוֹ לְחוֹב, וְגַם שֶׁחֲבֵרוֹ לֹא יְדוּנוֹ לְחוֹב וְעַל זֶה נֶעֶנְשׁוּ הַשְּׁבָטִים שֶׁעָבְרוּ עַל שֶׁהָיוּ צְרִיכִים לְדוּנוֹ לְכַף זְכוּת.
10“You thought evil of me, but E-lohim thought it for good ….” (Bereshit, 50:20)With this God showed that it was possible to bring the tribes into the exile of Egypt, the main point of which is separation, for at a time when Israel is unified nothing can rule over them. This began when Yosef was separated from the tribes, for while Yaakov Avinu was still among them it could not be discerned who was the greatest of the tribes, as sometimes he would bring this one closer, and sometimes this one closer, just whichever was fitting in his eyes to bring close at that time. Yet before his passing, at the time when he blessed them, he said to Yehuda, “the sons of your father will bow down before you,” and all recognized that Yehuda was dominant over his brothers. Because of this Yosef did not know how to conduct himself, whether to seat Yehuda at the head, for was he not the king, and it was forbidden to disrespect the king? Or should he seat himself at the head, for did he not know himself that Yehuda was the head and would therefore sit in a category unto himself, and not with the tribes? The tribes judged him that he did this out of hatred, and therefore they were punished to go with exile as they should have judged him favorably.Also with Yosef, his response was considered a sin, since he left room for them to be mistaken about him. Truly he should have acted by seating himself at the head since at this time he was king, yet he was to know in his heart that Yehuda was greater than he was. And truly, that his brothers were mistaken about him might seem like a small mistake in the eyes of man (yet it had tremendous results). Therefore one must always pray before God that it should never enter his mind to judge another as guilty, and also that his fellow man should not judge him as guilty, and therefore the tribes were punished, in that they were supposed to judge him favorably.