Tanach · Acharonim on Tanach · Or HaChaim · Torah
Or HaChaim on Numbers 32:25/אור החיים על במדבר ל״ב:כ״ה
אוַיֹּאמֶר בְּנֵי גָד וְגוֹ׳ לֵאמֹר עֲבָדֶיךָ יַעֲשׂוּ וְגוֹ׳. קָשֶׁה: א׳ אָמְרוֹ לֵאמֹר לְמִי יֹאמַר מֹשֶׁה. ב׳ מַה חִדּוּשׁ בְּדִבְרֵיהֶם עֲבָדֶיךָ יַעֲשׂוּ הֲלֹא כְּבָר הֵם קָדְמוּ וְאָמְרוּ מַה שֶׁצִּוָּה אוֹתָם מֹשֶׁה. ג׳ אַחַר שֶׁאָמְרוּ בְּדֶרֶךְ כְּלָל ״עֲבָדֶיךָ יַעֲשׂוּ כַּאֲשֶׁר אֲדֹנִי מְצַוֶּה״ לָמָּה הֻצְרְכוּ לוֹמַר עוֹד טַפֵּנוּ וְגוֹ׳ יִהְיוּ שָׁם וְגוֹ׳ וַעֲבָדֶיךָ יַעַבְרוּ. עוֹד לָמָּה כָּפְלוּ לוֹמַר כַּאֲשֶׁר אֲדֹנִי דֹּבֵר, וַהֲלֹא כְּבָר אָמְרוּ ״עֲבָדֶיךָ יַעֲשׂוּ כַּאֲשֶׁר אֲדֹנִי מְצַוֶּה״. ד׳ לָמָּה שִׁנָּה, בְּפָסוּק רִאשׁוֹן אָמַר מְצַוֶּה וּבְפָסוּק שֵׁנִי אָמַר דּוֹבֵר?
1 ויאמר בני גד…עבדיך יעשו The tribe of Gad….said: "your servants will do, etc." One difficulty in this verse is the word לאמור. Whom was Moses to tell of their decision? 2) What did they add that they had not previously told Moses in verse 18 already? They themselves had volunteered to do what Moses now demanded of them! 3) Having already said generally: "your servants will do what my lord commands," why did they have to add verses 26 and 27 altogether? 4) Why did they repeat once more: "as my lord has said (verse 27)? Why did the Torah refer to מצוה "commands" in verse 25 whereas in verse 27 it uses the word דבר, "has said?"
באָכֵן לְפִי מַה שֶׁפֵּרַשְׁתִּי בְּדִבְרֵי מֹשֶׁה שֶׁנִּתְכַּוֵּן לְחַדֵּשׁ לָהֶם שֶׁתִּהְיֶה כַּוָּנַת עֲבָרָתָם לַמִּלְחָמָה כְּמִשְׁפַּט אוֹהֲבֵי שְׁמוֹ, כְּמוֹ שֶׁכָּתַב רַמְבַּ״ם בְּפֶרֶק ז׳ מֵהִלְכוֹת מְלָכִים, גַּם בְּעִנְיַן פְּרָט הַקְדָּמַת עָרִים לַטַּף לְבִנְיַן גִּדְרוֹת צֹאן, כְּאָמְרָם זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (במדבר רבה כאן) שֶׁהֵם חִבְּבוּ הַמָּמוֹן מִטַּף וּמֹשֶׁה הָפַךְ לָהֶם, לָזֶה הֵשִׁיבוּ יַחַד כְּאִישׁ אֶחָד ״וַיֹּאמֶר בְּנֵי גָד״ וְהִסְכִּימוּ לְמַאֲמַר מֹשֶׁה בִּשְׁנֵי הַפְּרָטִים שֶׁחִדֵּשׁ לָהֶם מֹשֶׁה, וְהִתְחִילוּ מֵהַסָּמוּךְ שֶׁהוּא עִנְיַן חִבּוּב טַפָּם מִמָּמוֹנָם וְאָמְרוּ טַפֵּנוּ וְגוֹ׳ וְכָל בְּהֶמְתֵּנוּ, הֲרֵי שֶׁהִקְדִּימוּ טַפָּם לִבְהֶמְתָּם כְּדִבְרֵי מֹשֶׁה. וְאַחַר כָּךְ אָמְרוּ גַּם כֵּן הוֹדָאָתָם עֲשׂוֹת בַּפְּרָט הָרִאשׁוֹן שֶׁתִּהְיֶה כַּוָּנָתָם בַּמִּלְחָמָה לִפְנֵי ה׳, וְהוּא אָמְרָם ״וַעֲבָדֶיךָ יַעַבְרוּ כָּל חֲלוּץ צָבָא לִפְנֵי ה׳ כַּאֲשֶׁר אֲדֹנִי דֹּבֵר״, וְלֹא כְּמוֹ שֶׁאָמְרוּ בַּתְּחִלָּה ״נֵחָלֵץ חֻשִׁים לִפְנֵי בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל עַד הֲבִיאוֹנוּם״ וְגוֹ׳:
2Once you consider that I have explained that Moses stressed to these tribes after their undertaking that the motivation for their joining the war was what mattered foremost, the reply of these two tribes is easy to understand. According to Bamidbar Rabbah on our paragraph Moses also had corrected them when he altered the order of priorities regarding the building of cities and sheepfolds to take care of the children first and not of the livestock as they had indicated in verse 16. There had been two new elements in Moses' speech to them, and they responded positively on both counts. They commenced with that which had been mentioned last, i.e. the concern for their children, by listing their children, wives, and livestock in the appropriate order this time. They followed this up by stressing that all of them were going to cross the Jordan as a vanguard in the presence of the Lord, to show that they were aware of the crucial dimension of their purpose of fighting the enemies of G'd. They refrained from repeating that they would be in the forefront of "the children of Israel" as they had said in verse 17.
גוְהִנֵּה לְצַד כִּי שְׁנֵי דְּבָרִים אֵלּוּ יֵשׁ עֲלֵיהֶם חִיּוּב לְקַיְּמָם בִּשְׁבִיל שֶׁכָּךְ הִתְנָה עֲלֵיהֶם מֹשֶׁה, וְכָל תְּנַאי שֶׁבְּמָמוֹן קַיָּם הֲגַם שֶׁיִּהְיֶה הַמַּתְנֶה אִישׁ הֶדְיוֹט, לָזֶה נִתְחַכְּמוּ בִּתְחִלַּת דִּבְרֵיהֶם וְאָמְרוּ כִּי גַּם בְּלֹא חִיּוּב הַתְּנַאי עֲלֵיהֶם לְקַיֵּם כָּל דִּבְרֵי מֹשֶׁה נְבִיא ה׳ דִּכְתִיב (דברים י״ח:ט״ו) ״אֵלָיו תִּשְׁמָעוּן״, וְהוּא מַה שֶׁנִּתְכַּוְּנוּ בְּמַאֲמָר רִאשׁוֹן שֶׁאָמְרוּ עֲבָדֶיךָ יַעֲשׂוּ כַּאֲשֶׁר אֲדֹנִי מְצַוֶּה אוֹתָנוּ לַעֲשׂוֹת גַּם בְּלֹא טַעַם שֶׁהוּא תְּנַאי נְתִינַת הָאָרֶץ, וְלָזֶה אָמַר תֵּיבַת לֵאמֹר, פֵּרוּשׁ, בְּמַאֲמָרְךָ לְבַד חוֹבָה עָלֵינוּ לַעֲשׂוֹת מִצְוָתְךָ.
3We have a rule that in matters involving money one must abide by the terms set even if the person setting the condition is a layman; they wanted to go on record, that in this instance they would have abided by any condition Moses would set inasmch as he was their prophet, leader, etc. G'd had commanded the Israelites to heed everything the prophet would tell them (Deut. 18.15). This is what they had in mind with their first reaction הנה עבדיך יעשו כאשר אדני מצוה. In other words, they now stressed that their motivation in doing what they had undertaken to do was to display their obedience to the command of Moses in his capacity as the prophet. This is why they added כאשר אדני דבר, "as my lord says." The word לאמר too was meant to indicate their awareness of their obligation to do what Moses "said" even if he had not promised them that they would receive their share of the inheritance on the East Bank as a reward for abiding by the conditions he had set for them.
דגַּם יִרְצֶה לְשׁוֹן עִלּוּי וְרוֹמְמוּת, כִּי דָּבָר זֶה אֲמָרוּהוּ בְּנֵי גָד וּבְנֵי רְאוּבֵן לְצַד מַעֲלַת מֶלֶךְ וְנָבִיא, וְאַחַר כָּךְ פֵּרְשׁוּ הַדְּבָרִים וְאָמְרוּ עֲבָדֶיךָ יַעֲשׂוּ כַּאֲשֶׁר אֲדֹנִי דּוֹבֵר, פֵּרוּשׁ, גַּם מִלְּבַד חִיּוּב הַבָּא מֵחֲמַת הַמִּצְוָה יֵשׁ חוֹבָה עָלֵינוּ לַעֲשׂוֹת, הֲגַם שֶׁלֹּא הָיָה הַדָּבָר מִצְוָה אֶלָּא דִּבּוּר, כַּדְּבָרִים הָעוֹבְרִים בֵּין אָדָם לַחֲבֵרוֹ בְּעִנְיְנֵי תְּנָאֵי מֶקַח וּמִמְכָּר זוֹכֶה וּמְזַכֶּה בְּעִנְיְנֵי הָעוֹלָם. וְהַכַּוָּנָה בָּזֶה שֶׁמְּקַבְּלִים גַּם כֵּן עֲלֵיהֶם הַדָּבָר כַּדְּבָרִים שֶׁמִּתְחַיֵּב אָדָם לַחֲבֵרוֹ בִּתְנָאֵי הַמָּמוֹן שֶׁקַּיָּמִין כִּרְאִי מוּצָק.
4They meant to stress that even if Moses had not phrased his suggestions as a condition but had merely said so, לאמור without embodying his suggestions in the form of a binding contract, they would have taken him at his word and would have complied with his wishes. After all, one is in the habit of honouring financial agreements even if they are made only orally and do not involve the decree issued by a mutually recognised expert in the matter.