Tanach · Rishonim on Tanach · Ramban · Torah
Ramban on Exodus 30:15/רמב"ן על שמות ל׳:ט״ו
אוְטַעַם הֶעָשִׁיר לֹא יַרְבֶּה וְהַדַּל לֹא יַמְעִיט שֶׁיָּבִיאוּ הַשְּׁקָלִים בַּהַשְׁוָיָה הַנִּזְכֶּרֶת. וְהַנִּרְאֶה מִן הַכָּתוּב הַזֶּה שֶׁאִם הֵבִיא הַדַּל בְּשִׁקְלוֹ פָּחוֹת מִמַּחֲצִית הַשֶּׁקֶל, שֶׁהוּא עוֹבֵר בַּלָּאו הַזֶּה, שֶׁהַכָּתוּב הַזֶּה מְנִיעָה. שֶׁאִם נֹאמַר בְּ"הֶעָשִׁיר לֹא יַרְבֶּה" שֶׁיִּהְיֶה שְׁלִילוֹת, לוֹמַר שֶׁבְּכָךְ דַּי לוֹ, לֹא נוּכַל לְפָרֵשׁ כֵּן בְּ"וְהַדַּל לֹא יַמְעִיט". וְאִם כֵּן שְׁתֵּיהֶן מְנִיעוֹת, אִם שָׁקַל הֶעָשִׁיר הַיְּחִידִי יוֹתֵר, וְשָׁקַל הַדַּל פָּחוֹת, עָבַר בְּלָאו. וְשֶׁמָּא מַה שֶׁהָיוּ תּוֹרְמִין בַּקֻּפּוֹת עַל הָאָבוּד וְעַל הֶעָתִיד לִגָּבוֹת (כתובות קח.) יְתַקֵּן לָהֶם זֶה, כִּי הַדַּל הַמַּמְעִיט בַּמּוֹתָר עָתִיד לִגָּבוֹת הוּא, וּמִן הֶעָשִׁיר הַמַּרְבֶּה לֹא יִתְרְמוּ הַגַּבָּאִין בְּיִתְרוֹן, וְלֹא יְהוּ מְזַכִּין בְּמוֹתָרוֹת. וְרָאִיתִי לְבַעַל הֲלָכוֹת וּלְכָל הַמּוֹנִים הַמִּצְוֹת שֶׁלֹּא הִזְכִּירוּ הַלָּאו הַזֶּה:
1THE RICH SHALL NOT GIVE MORE, AND THE POOR SHALL NOT GIVE LESS. The meaning of this is that they should all bring the specified amount of money in equality. It would appear from this verse that if the poor man gave as his shekel-dues less than the half-shekel [prescribed by the Torah], he transgresses this negative commandment, since this verse constitutes a prohibition. For even if we were to say that the phrase the rich shall not give more constitutes a mere negation,86, Note 71. meaning that it is enough for him to give the half-shekel, we could not so interpret and the poor shall not give less. If so, they must both be prohibitions: thus if the individual rich man gave more, or the poor man gave less, he transgressed this negative commandment. Perhaps the reason why the Temple — officers used to take up the shekel-dues in baskets [out of the shekel-chamber], with the intention also to cover the shekels lost and those still to be collected,87 was to rectify this matter, for if the poor gave less, the balance was destined to be collected from him, but as for the rich who gave more, the Temple-officers would not “take up” his surplus, for they would not take possession of these surpluses [on anyone’s behalf]. However, I have noticed that neither the author of the Hilchoth Gedoloth nor all other scholars who counted the commandments [including the Rambam in his Sefer Hamitzvoth], have mentioned this as one of the negative commandments.