Chasidut · Breslov

Likutei Moharan 17:9/ליקוטי מוהר"ן י״ז:ט׳

אט וְזֶה:
19 . And this is [the explanation of the opening verse]: {“Vayehi heim m’rikim sakeihem (And it happened as they began emptying their sacks), that behold, each one’s bundle of money was found in his sack. And when they and their father saw the bundles of money, they became frightened. Their father Yaakov said to them, ‘You’re making me shakal (lose my children). Yosef is gone. And Shimon is gone. And now you want to take Binyamin?’”}
בוַיְהִי הֵם מְרִיקִים שַׂקֵּיהֶם – הַיְנוּ בְּחִינַת לָבְשׁוּ שָׁמַיִם קַדְרוּת וְשַׂק וְכוּ'. שָׁמַיִם – הַיְנוּ יִרְאָה וְאַהֲבָה כַּנַּ"ל. וּכְשֶׁהֵם מְרִיקִים אֶת הַשַּׂק וְהַחשֶׁךְ מִן הַיִּרְאָה וְהָאַהֲבָה,
2And it happened as they began emptying their sacks — This corresponds to, “… clothe the heavens in blackness and a sackcloth I will make their garment.” “Shamayim (heavens)” is fear and love, as explained above. And when they empty the sack and the darkness from the fear and the love….
גוְהִנֵּה אִישׁ צְרוֹר כַּסְפּוֹ בְּשַׂקּוֹ – צְרוֹר כַּסְפּוֹ זֶה בְּחִינַת הַצַּדִּיק, בְּחִינַת (משלי ז): צְרוֹר הַכֶּסֶף לָקַח בְּיָדוֹ, שֶׁהֵם הַצַּדִּיקִים, כְּמוֹ שֶׁפֵּרֵשׁ רַשִׁ"י שָׁם.
3that behold, each one’s bundle of money was found in his sack — “One’s bundle of money” alludes to the tzaddik, corresponding to (Proverbs 7:20), “He has taken the bundle of money with him”—this refers to the tzaddikim, as Rashi explains there.
דבְּשַׂקּוֹ – הַיְנוּ שֶׁאוֹר הַצַּדִּיק נִתְחַשֵּׁךְ וְנִתְלַבֵּשׁ וְנִתְכַּסָּה בְּקַדְרוּת וְשַׂק, הַיְנוּ שֶׁמַּרְגִּישִׁים שֶׁהַשַּׂק וְהַחשֶׁךְ שֶׁהָיָה עַל הַיִּרְאָה וְהָאַהֲבָה, זֶה מֵחֲמַת שַׂק וְחשֶׁךְ, שֶׁנֶּחֱשַׁךְ לָהֶם אוֹר הַצַּדִּיק כַּנַּ"ל.
4in his sack — In other words, the light of the tzaddik became obscured and enclothed and concealed in blackness and sackcloth—the sack and the darkness covering the fear and the love were felt. This was because the sack and the darkness obfuscated the tzaddik’s light from them.
הוַיִּרְאוּ אֶת צְרֹרוֹת כַּסְפֵּיהֶם הֵמָּה וַאֲבִיהֶם – הַיְנוּ שֶׁרָאוּ וְהִכִּירוּ, שֶׁצְּרוֹרוֹת כַּסְפֵּיהֶם תָּלוּי בְּהַחֹמֶר וְהַצּוּרָה, שֶׁנִּקְרָא הֵמָּה וַאֲבִיהֶם.
5And when they and their father saw their bundles of money, they became frightened — That is, they saw and recognized that their bundles of money are dependent upon the matter and form, which are called they and their father.
והֵמָּה – זֶה הַחֹמֶר, שֶׁהֵם כְּלֵי הַמַּעֲשֶׂה,
6they — This refers to matter, for they are the instruments of action.
זוַאֲבִיהֶם – הוּא הַשֵּׂכֶל שֶׁנִּקְרָא אָב, בְּחִינַת אָב בְּחָכְמָה, הַיְנוּ כַּנַּ"ל, שֶׁהִתְגַּלּוּת אוֹר הַצַּדִּיק, שֶׁיִּזְכּוּ לְהַכִּירוֹ וּלְהָבִין וְלִטְעֹם וְלִרְאוֹת אוֹרוֹ הַגָּדוֹל, הוּא תָּלוּי בִּשְׁלֵמוּת הַמַּעֲשִׂים וּבְזַכּוּת הַשֵּׂכֶל.
7and their father — He is the intellect, which is called father, corresponding to, “Father (av) indicates wisdom” (Megillah 13a) —<as Onkelos translates “yaakveini (he went behind my back)” as “he outsmarted me”>. In other words, as explained, the revelation of the tzaddik’s light—meriting to recognize him and understand, taste and see his great light—is dependent upon the perfection of actions and purification of the intellect.
חוַיֹּאמֶר לָהֶם יַעֲקֹב אֲבִיהֶם – הַיְנוּ תּוֹכְחוֹת הַשֵּׂכֶל, שֶׁמּוֹכִיחַ אֶת הֶחֳמָרִים, שֶׁהֵם כְּלֵי הַמַּעֲשֶׂה, שֶׁהוּא תּוֹלֶה הַסִּרְחוֹן בִּכְלֵי הַמַּעֲשֶׂה. וְזֶה:
8Their father Yaakov said to them — This is the reproof of the intellect which rebukes the matter/the instruments of action. He attributes the guilt to the instruments of action. And this is, <the intellect says to them>:
טאֹתִי שִׁכַּלְתֶּם – שֶׁעַל־יְדֵי הַמַּעֲשִׂים הָעֲכוּרִים גּוֹרְמִים כִּלָּיוֹן וְהֶפְסֵד לְהַשֵּׂכֶל.
9You ’re making me ShaKaL, lose my children — Through unseemly deeds they bring about an eradication and loss of the SeKheL (the intellect).
ייוֹסֵף אֵינֶנּוּ – זֶה בְּחִינַת: הוֹן יֹסִיף רֵעִים רַבִּים הַנַּ"ל,
10YOSeF is gone — This corresponds to, “Wealth YOSiF (adds) many friends.”
יאוְשִׁמְעוֹן אֵינֶנּוּ – זֶה בְּחִינַת: וְשָׁמְעוֹ הוֹלֵךְ בְּכָל הַמְּדִינוֹת, הַנַּעֲשֶׂה עַל־יְדֵי בְּחִינַת הוֹן יֹסִיף כַּנַּ"ל,
11ShiMOn is gone — This corresponds to, “ShaM’O (his fame) went out to all the provinces”; which comes about through “wealth adds,” as explained.
יבוְאֶת בִּנְיָמִן תִּקָּחוּ – זֶה בְּחִינַת: מִזְבֵּחַ בְּחֶלְקוֹ שֶׁל טוֹרֵף, שֶׁהוּא בִּנְיָמִין, שֶׁעִקַּר שְׁלֵמוּת הַשֵּׂכֶל תָּלוּי בָּזֶה כַּנַּ"ל, דְּהַיְנוּ שֶׁהַשֵּׂכֶל מוֹכִיחַ וְאוֹמֵר, שֶׁעִקַּר הַחִסָּרוֹן שֶׁנִּתְעַכֵּר הַמֹּחַ הוּא תָּלוּי רַק בִּכְלֵי הַמַּעֲשֶׂה,
12And now you want to take Binyamin? — This corresponds to: The altar was in the portion of a toreif (predator)—this being Binyamin. The principal perfection of the intellect is dependent upon <him>, as explained above. In other words, [its perfection results from] the intellect offering rebuke. It states that the main shortcoming, the mind’s being unsettled, is entirely due to the instruments of action.
יגדְּהַיְנוּ צְדָקָה, שֶׁהִיא תָּלוּי בְּמַעֲשֶׂה, בְּחִינַת (ישעיהו ל״ב:י״ז): וְהָיָה מַעֲשֵׂה הַצְּדָקָה; שֶׁעַל־יָדָהּ נִשְׁלָם הַשֵּׂכֶל כַּנַּ"ל, כִּי כְּשֶׁנּוֹתְנִין צְדָקָה, עַל־יְדֵי־זֶה נַעֲשִׂין גֵּרִים כַּנַּ"ל, וְעַל־יְדֵי־ זֶה נִשְׁלָם הַמִּזְבֵּחַ, שֶׁהוּא בְּחִינַת שֻׁלְחָנוֹ שֶׁל אָדָם, דְּהַיְנוּ שֶׁזּוֹכִין לֶאֱכֹל בִּקְדֻשָּׁה, וַאֲזַי נִשְׁלָם הַשֵּׂכֶל, וַאֲזַי זוֹכִין לִרְאוֹת אוֹר הַצַּדִּיק, וְעַל־יְדֵי־זֶה מְקַבְּלִין מִמֶּנּוּ יִרְאָה וְאַהֲבָה כַּנַּ"ל:
13This [missing factor] is charity, which is itself dependent upon action, as alluded to in (Isaiah 32:17), “And the action of charity,” through which the intellect is perfected. For when one gives charity, this produces converts, as above. As a result, the altar—synonymous with a man’s table—is perfected. In other words, we merit eating with holiness, and then the intellect is perfected. And then, we merit seeing the light of the tzaddik, through which we receive fear and love from him, as explained.