Tanach · Acharonim on Tanach · Or HaChaim · Torah

Or HaChaim on Numbers 14:32/אור החיים על במדבר י״ד:ל״ב

אוּפִגְרֵיכֶם אַתֶּם וְגוֹ׳. צָרִיךְ לָדַעַת לָמָּה הֻצְרַךְ לוֹמַר כֵּן אַחַר שֶׁכְּבָר אָמַר ״בַּמִּדְבָּר הַזֶּה יִפְּלוּ פִגְרֵיכֶם״. וְאֶפְשָׁר שֶׁנִּתְכַּוֵּן לוֹמַר שֶׁלֹּא יַכְנִיסוּ בְּנֵיהֶם עַצְמוֹתָם לָאָרֶץ כְּמוֹ שֶׁהֶעֱלוּ עַצְמוֹת יוֹסֵף וְעַצְמוֹת הַשְּׁבָטִים לָאָרֶץ, אֶלָּא יִפְּלוּ בַּמִּדְבָּר.
1 ופגריכם אתם, "As to you, you are already carcasses, etc." Why did the Torah have to write this verse, seeing it had already told us in verse 29 what would happen to the parents of these children? Perhaps the Torah intended to inform us that the children would not be allowed to carry the bones of their parents into the Holy Land with them, as the children of Israel had done with the bones of Joseph and those of the other tribes (Joseph's brothers).
בעוֹד נִרְאֶה שֶׁיְּכַוֵּן לוֹמַר, שֶׁמִּלְּבַד שֶׁיִּפְּלוּ פִּגְרֵיהֶם כְּמוֹ שֶׁאָמַר לְמַעְלָה, פֵּרוּשׁ שֶׁיִּפְּלוּ פְּגָרִים מֵתִים, אָמַר עוֹד שֶׁהַגּוּפוֹת גַּם כֵּן תִּהְיֶה לָהֶם נְפִילָה בַּמִּדְבָּר, שֶׁיִּהְיוּ בְּיַד ס״מ שַׂר הַמִּדְבָּר, שֶׁאֵין לְךָ נְפִילָה גְּדוֹלָה מִזּוֹ כַּיָּדוּעַ לְיוֹדְעֵי מַדָּע. וְלָזֶה דִּקְדֵּק לוֹמַר ״וּפִגְרֵיכֶם אַתֶּם יִפְּלוּ״, שֶׁאַחַר שֶׁקְּרָאָם פְּגָרִים אָמַר יִפְּלוּ, וְאִם עַל הַמִּיתָה הוּא אוֹמֵר הָיָה לוֹ לְהַקְדִּים הַנְּפִילָה שֶׁהִיא הַסּוֹבֶבֶת בָּהֶם שֵׁם הַפֶּגֶר, וּכְמוֹ שֶׁאָמַר לְמַעְלָה ״יִפְּלוּ פִגְרֵיכֶם״, אֶלָּא וַדַּאי עַל הַשְׁפָּלַת וּנְפִילַת הַגּוּפוֹת אַחַר מִיתָה הוּא אוֹמֵר. וְדִקְדֵּק לוֹמַר אַתֶּם, שֶׁלֹּא יָבִינוּ מַאֲמַר ״פִּגְרֵיכֶם״ שֶׁבָּא לוֹמַר עַל בְּנֵי בְנֵיהֶם, שֶׁגַּם עֲלֵיהֶם יֹאמַר בְּכִנּוּי, כִּי הַבֵּן חֵלֶק מֵאָבִיו, לָזֶה אָמַר ״אַתֶּם״.
2The Torah may also have intended to tell us about another dimension of the death of this generation. Not only would their bodies die in the desert but they would experience an even greater indignity in that their very bodies would become the property of the שר המדבר, the spirtually negative force which rules over the desert. Scholars who have researched this matter agree that there is no more demeaning experience than to be told that after one has become a carcass one will yet experience another "fall." This is why the Torah speaks of פגריכם..יפלו, "your carcasses will fall." If the word "you will fall" had applied only to their actual death, the word "you will fall" should have preceded any word which described the death. To make this point very clear, the Torah wrote: "you who are already carcasses will fall." Clearly, this phraseology refers to something demeaning that will happen to their bodies after their deaths. The Torah is at pains to add the word אתם, "you," to prevent us from interpreting the verse as speaking of something that would happen to the grandchildren of the present generation. In view of the fact that grandchildren are often described as children, seeing the son is part of his father, the Torah was careful to prevent any misunderstanding by writing אתם.
גוְחַכְמֵי קַאשְׂטִילְיָה הַמְּגֹרָשִׁים שָׁמַעְתִּי מִשְּׁמָם שֶׁפֵּרְשׁוּ שֶׁחוֹזֵר עַל מֹשֶׁה וְאַהֲרֹן שֶׁגָּזַר ה׳ עֲלֵיהֶם גַּם כֵּן שֶׁיָּמוּתוּ בַּמִּדְבָּר, וְלָזֶה אָמַר תֵּיבַת אַתֶּם לְמֹשֶׁה וְאַהֲרֹן שֶׁעִמָּהֶם הוּא מְדַבֵּר, וְנָתַן ה׳ טַעַם לִדְבָרָיו בְּמַה שֶׁגָּמַר אוֹמֶר ״אִם לֹא זֹאת אֶעֱשֶׂה לְכָל הָעֵדָה וְגוֹ׳ יִתַּמּוּ וְשָׁם יָמֻתוּ״, עַל דֶּרֶךְ אָמְרָם זִכְרוֹנָם לִבְרָכָה (במדבר רבה יט,יג) בְּפָסוּק ״וַיֵּתֶא רָאשֵׁי עָם״ שֶׁטַּעַם שֶׁנִּקְבַּר מֹשֶׁה בְּעֵבֶר הַיַּרְדֵּן לְהָבִיא דּוֹר הַמִּדְבָּר לָעוֹלָם הַבָּא, וְלָזֶה אִם לֹא הָיוּ מֵתִים מֹשֶׁה וְאַהֲרֹן בַּמִּדְבָּר לֹא הָיוּ חַיִּים דּוֹר הַמִּדְבָּר. וְזֶה דֶּרֶךְ רֶמֶז, כִּי וַדַּאי שֶׁלֹּא יֹאמַר פֶּגֶר עַל מֹשֶׁה וְאַהֲרֹן שֶׁגּוּפָן זַךְ כְּמַלְאָכִים, גַּם לֹא יֹאמַר לְשׁוֹן נְפִילָה עַל שְׁנֵי מְאוֹרֵי עוֹלָם.
3I have heard in the name of scholars who have been expelled from Castilia that they interpreted the word אתם as a reference to Moses and Aaron whose death in the desert G'd had also decreed. Seeing G'd was addressing Moses and Aaron at the time, He used the word אתם when referring to what would happen to them personally. G'd provided a reason for His words when He concluded (verse 35) by saying: אם לא זאת אעשה לכל העדה הרעה הזאת…יתמו ושם ימותו. This can be understood as similar to the way Bamidbar Rabbah 19,13 explains Deut. 33,21: ויתא ראשי עם. The Midrash explains that the reason Moses was buried on the East Bank of the Jordan was to enable the generation of the spies to be resurrected at the time Moses would be resurrected. If Moses and Aaron had not died in the desert, the people would have thought that Moses led a new generation into the land of Canaan and thereby fulfilled his life's mission, whereas the generation which died in the desert was lost forever. Moses had to die and be buried in the desert to keep alive the tradition that eventually he himself would lead the generation he had led out of Egypt to the Holy Land at the time of the resurrection. This is, of course, merely an allegorial interpretation. It is quite inconceivable that the Torah would refer to the bodies of Moses and Aaron as פגר, "carcass." Their bodies were as refined as if they had been angels. The Torah would also not apply the tern נפילה, "fall," to two of the most illustrious human beings such as Moses and Aaron.